Schoolhouse.world: peer tutoring, for free.
Free SAT® Prep, as part of a research study.
SAT® Bootcamps
Free SAT® Prep, as part of a research study.
Get free help applying to college.
College Admissions Workshops
Get free help applying to college.
1-on-1 conversations on global topics
Dialogues
1-on-1 conversations on global topics
A global network of volunteers.
Explore Tutors
A global network of volunteers.

Henderson H

Tutor

Joined Jan 2025 · He/Him · 3:56 AM Local

About

I'm a high school senior thats passionate about learning and teaching. I'm a part of many clubs and activities that include science and math (Science olympiad and math league); I've also tutored many kids in these subjects. I got a 790 on the math section on my most recent SAT and I'm currently enrolled in 5 AP courses: AP Biology, AP Calculus, AP Physics, AP Statistics and AP Literature while at the same time, maintaining a 4.4 GPA. I'm happy to help anyone in STEM subjects as I'd like to make a positive impact on the learning community!

Tutor

Feb 2025 - Present

United States of America

Stats

1792

SP

12

Badges

55

Countries Reached

418

Learners Impacted

72

Sessions Hosted

6,201

Tutoring Minutes

Certifications

SAT® Prep
Honorary
SAT Math
Honorary
SAT Reading & Writing
Honorary

Connections

Ishrat Jahan R
Jennie H
Fairooz P
Hetvi p
Nyla B
Laina A
Jennie H

Upcoming Sessions

[1500+ SCORER] Final October SAT ELA review (HARDEST QUESTIONS)

    Starts

This session is designed for students aiming for 1500+ on the SAT, focusing on the hardest reading, writing, and language questions from past exams. Learners will actively analyze tricky passages, identify common pitfalls, and practice advanced strategies to maximize ELA scores. Expect a fast-paced, interactive review with opportunities for Q&A and targeted problem-solving.

Henderson H

133/200

Featured Feedback

91

Thanks for the lesson! It really helped with many of the minor mistakes I was making and the explanations were mostly easy to understand.

Learner · 1 day ago

Your confidence-building approach was consistently effective throughout the session. You proactively reassured students about the difficulty level, saying "don't feel bad, or don't feel discouraged if you get these questions wrong, because they are very hard" and reminding them multiple times that these were the hardest SAT questions. When students provided correct reasoning, you validated their thinking - telling Sofia "your first step is correct" even when her overall approach was flawed, and acknowledging Samuel's alternative method as viable. You used positive reinforcement appropriately, giving thumbs up for correct answers in chat and saying "you're welcome" when students thanked you for explanations. You also normalized struggle by sharing your own SAT experience, mentioning that statistics questions were what cost you the perfect score, which helped students feel less alone in finding certain topics challenging. Your ability to create a comfortable learning environment was exceptional throughout the session. You established a relaxed, conversational tone from the start with casual greetings and maintained it throughout. You handled technical difficulties with your video connection smoothly without letting it disrupt the flow or create stress. When you made small errors during explanations, you corrected them naturally without self-criticism, modeling resilience. You encouraged questions consistently and responded to each one thoughtfully, creating a space where students felt safe to ask for clarification. Your approach of having students submit answers privately before discussing them publicly removed the pressure of being wrong in front of peers. You also showed genuine interest in student learning by asking about pacing preferences and adjusting accordingly. Your use of collaborative problem-solving, where students could build on each other's ideas, fostered a supportive learning community. You balanced challenge with support effectively - pushing students to think deeply while providing scaffolding when needed. The way you acknowledged different solution methods and learning preferences helped all students feel valued regardless of their approach to problem-solving.

Tutor · 3 days ago

Your ability to identify and understand learner struggles was consistently strong throughout the session. When Mimi asked for more detailed explanation on the rational equation problem, you immediately recognized her confusion and provided a clear, step-by-step breakdown focusing on the conceptual understanding that "0 over anything equals 0." When Samuel expressed confusion about your algebraic steps in the triangle problem, you patiently walked through each calculation again. You also demonstrated diagnostic skills by recognizing when students chose incorrect answers for understandable reasons - like when many students chose 4 for the rectangle problem, you specifically asked someone to explain their reasoning to understand the error pattern. You showed awareness that students might struggle with advanced concepts, prefacing the unit circle problem with reassurance that "these are very hard, so don't feel discouraged." Your adaptation to learners' unique needs was particularly effective throughout the session. You consistently offered multiple solution methods, such as showing both the traditional algebraic approach and the Desmos graphing method for the infinitely many solutions problem. When Saanvi suggested an alternative algebraic approach to the rectangle problem, you validated it as equally valid, demonstrating flexibility in accepting different problem-solving styles. You adjusted your explanations based on individual questions - providing more conceptual detail for Mimi while offering computational shortcuts for Samuel. You also adapted your difficulty level appropriately, acknowledging when topics like the unit circle were beyond typical SAT scope while still explaining them for interested students. Your responsiveness to the group's learning pace was evident when you checked about timing preferences and adjusted accordingly. You also differentiated your support well - some students needed more foundational explanations while others were ready for advanced alternative methods. Your willingness to revisit and re-explain concepts multiple ways until students understood showed strong adaptive teaching. The way you handled the advanced unit circle problem by both explaining it thoroughly and contextualizing its rarity on actual SATs demonstrated thoughtful adaptation to diverse preparation needs.

Tutor · 3 days ago

Your engagement with learners was consistently strong throughout the session. You actively involved students by having them solve problems independently first, then share answers in private chat before discussing solutions. You regularly checked for understanding with questions like "Are there any questions?" and "Does that make sense?" You responded thoughtfully to student queries, such as when Samuel asked about faster solving methods and when Mimi requested more detailed explanations. You also adapted to the group dynamic well, asking about pacing preferences and adjusting your approach based on student feedback. Your use of collaborative problem-solving, where you had students identify wrong answers first, kept them actively participating rather than passively listening. Your encouragement of student thinking was particularly effective throughout the session. You consistently asked students to explain their reasoning before providing solutions. When Sofia shared her proportional approach to the rectangle problem, you listened carefully and identified both what was correct and where the logic broke down. You asked clarifying questions like "Does someone want to explain that?" when multiple students chose the same incorrect answer, encouraging peer explanation. When Saanvi suggested an alternative algebraic approach to the rectangle problem, you acknowledged it as valid and showed flexibility in solution methods. You also created opportunities for students to share their problem-solving strategies, such as when Samuel explained his approach to the rational equation. Your approach of having students eliminate obviously wrong answers first was particularly effective at getting them to engage with the mathematical reasoning. You also did well in validating student approaches even when they led to incorrect answers, showing them where their logic was sound before redirecting. The combination of private chat submissions followed by public discussion created a safe space for students to share their thinking without immediate judgment. To enhance engagement further, you could occasionally have students explain concepts to each other rather than always directing explanations back to you, which would create more peer-to-peer learning opportunities.

Tutor · 3 days ago

Badges

  • New Kid in Class

    Attend 1 session

  • Explorer

    Attend 5 sessions

  • Show Your Stuff

    Get 1 certification

  • Thinker

    Get 5 certifications

  • Red Delicious

    Host 1 session

  • Granny Smith

    Host 5 sessions

  • Honeycrisp

    Host 10 sessions

  • Fuji

    Host 25 sessions

Schoolhouse.world: peer tutoring, for free.

About

About UsPartnershipsRoadmapCareersDonate

© Schoolhouse.world

Terms of ServiceTerms & ConditionsPrivacy PolicyTrust & SafetyPress